QUOTE (Tobias2343 @ Nov 13 2009, 10:26 PM)

Well, I am going to differ with Liz here...I really enjoyed the episode! I am a true romantic at heart, and I especially enjoyed Natalie telling T.K. about why she chose to marry Mitch and why she would do it over again...it's been a while since we've heard from her about that! I also always enjoy Monk's "Trudy" moments, and when he told Stottlemeyer that T.K. was "his answer," because that was something his Trudy used to say to him, I really liked that!
That's fine, everyone's got their own tastes and everyone is different. This is just not my kind of episode. I watch Monk because it's usually not like this. This episode was so over the top and full of it that it passed my threshold and kept going, it nearly put me into a diabetic coma. But that's just me.
I also have kind of a problem with the idea of someone else being the whole key to another person's happiness, or the reason for their being. It always has bugged me. Every person has a valid reason for living all by themselves. If they fall in love and are happy together, I'm happy for them, but I dislike this idea that everyone should be with someone or out looking for the other half of their being and that they are somehow incomplete until they find that person. That is an idea that seems to be gaining in popularity and is kind of insulting to people who are perfectly happy being single is all.
QUOTE
Here are some of my other thoughts on the episode:
-I felt SO BAD for Monk during the bachelor party...he was trying so hard. That was a little tough to watch, although I must admit...I'm not the drinking/wild partying/stripper-loving type, either, so when I get married someday, I'm either going to have to forgo the bachelor party or go Monk's route...in all seriousness! lol, but I felt really bad for him, he was so happy and he was trying so hard to put on a nice party for his friend...it was a little hard to watch, but it was also kind of sweet, too. And Stottlemeyer was a good sport, good for him!

I am SO with you here! That had to be the worst bachelor party, EVER! Poor Monk thought he was doing so well. And Stottlemeyer had to know when he asked him to be the best man that the party was going to be a Monk version of a real party, that's probably why he told him that his biggest responsibility was going to be keeping up with the ring, he knew that Monk could hold onto a wedding ring!I guess it was a good thing that Stottlemeyer has had two other chances tohave real bachelor parties. I like that he was a very good sport about it.
And Randy must have been well on his way to drinking all 12 of those beers by himself if he thought that was a good movie choice and didn't think there was anything weird about that car being on fire,or even recognize that it was Stottlemeyer's car!
QUOTE
-Could it have been any more obvious from the beginning who "the guy" was? But that's okay...I thought the episode in general was very well done with all the surprise mishaps even though it was clear who was responsible...the exploding gift in the church especially caught me by surprise.
I don't think so. They would have to work really, really hard to make it more transparent, and if they did that, I would really have been tocked off that they put that much effort into making it clear who the guy was, but almost no effort into this episode where it would have counted.
QUOTE
-Okay, so who caught the Albright reference? He was supposed to be Natalie's date for the wedding. Ugh...clearly they're mentioning him because, as we all know by now, he's returning for the finale. Ugh ugh ugh ugh...I do NOT want to see them get together, it's just so WRONG! I don't even care if Monk/Nat don't get together, Nat/Albright just seems so wrong, and feels so forced. I'm still hoping she'll ultimately reject him. And yes, before this comment starts World War III, I realize this scene at the end was not thrown in there to mislead us, but I LOVED seeing Monk and Natalie walk out of the ceremony arm in arm.

I caught it!I'm not thrilled with the 'everyone gets a relationship as a prize' notion, either. But I'm more okay with Albright than Monk because at least with Albright, he's out at sea a lot so it is a very logical and believable reason why Natalie's relationship with him doesn't conflict with her basically 24/7 job with Monk. And if she only sees Albright when he's in town, and she probably would want to spend most of the time he's in port with him, that would mean that maybe monk is getting better, and he can let Natalie have a few days off all together here and there to see Albright. But really, if Natalie had to be with someone at the end of the series, my first choice would have been Ambrose. I just liked their interaction, brief as it was, in Goes Home Again. I don't like cliche romanticism, but I have to admit, I am a sucker for a shy, awkward, kind of nerdy romance. Everyone, I guess, has their weaknesses. My own husband was so shy that he knew me for three years before he ever said more than 'Hi' to me, and then he just talked to me about his pet hamster. It was another two and and a half years before he actually got the nerve to speak to me again and ask me out. I'm a sucker for a man who likes small animals and is so in awe of me he has a hard time speaking.
I guess I'm a hard person to win over, but when the right one comes along, I know it. Nothing at all wrong with his brakes. Maybe that's why I have kind of a problem with the breakneck kind of feel I got from the Stottlemeyer/Jensen thing. I know they said six months last night, but it still feels very rushed to me, starting from the first episode. And anyone whose been married twice and nearly engaged to a murderer needs to seriously have those brakes looked at. Maybe, because TK wanted to 'tap the brakes', she'll balance him out enough that this time, it'll work out.