RockyII
Feb 10 2009, 11:57 PM
TONIGHT ANXIOUSLY WAITNG TO WATCH THE WESTMINSTER FINALE. DID I SEE THE BEST IN SHOW JUDGE - SARI BREWSTER TIETJEN- BEING HELP FROM HER LIMOUSINE WEARING A FUR COAT? DID I ACTUALLY SEE THAT? I WAS SO TAKEN A BACK BY THIS THAT I WAS COMPLETELY DISTRACTED. WAS THIS CRUELLA DE VIL ARRIVING? I CANNOT EVEN BEGIN TO SAY HOW INEFFECTIVE TO THIS SHOWS FUTURE PROGRESS THIS WOULD BE. THE NEW GENERATION, WHICH SPONSER PEDIGREE HAS REALIZED, WOULD BE AGAST AT SUCH IGNORANCE AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST. IF SHE WAS WEARING A FUR COAT I BELIEVE SHE SHOULD HAVE BETTER HANDLERS TO HELP HER ACCEPT A HUMANE NEW VIEW, OR CAST HER ASIDE AND REACH OUT TO THOSE WHO NOW KNOW IT IS SUCH A 1920'S WRONG MESSAGE FOR THOSE LIVING IN 2009. IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO LIGHT THAT DOG AND CAT FUR FARMS ARE PREVALENT AND ... I'AM JUST BESIDE MYSELF. IS THE FAMOUS WORLD RENOWNED WESTMINSTER DOG SHOW AGAIN SUSPECT?
Cts_Wardour
Feb 11 2009, 06:53 AM
Get over it!!! It could have been faux fur for all you know!!!
CanadianDogFan
Feb 17 2009, 06:16 PM
I agree. A fur coat's not the end of the world. It could have been faux, or it could have been old. I myself have an inherited fur coat that must be well over 50 years old. And yes, I wear it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.