QUOTE (neu @ Feb 2 2009, 09:47 AM)

The differences have always been used for power: the different (race, color, religion, ideology, the nation ,..., another city, another neighborhood ...) are dangerous, they try to remove our work, our homes, our livelihood, our ...., and that's why we must defend ourselves from them. That fear is what makes us manipulate elements.
Live on mars, is an English series, based on an open and interesting premise: a cop has a traffic accident and wakes up in 1973 .... (the atmosphere is great, especially for those who have known the 70's, the Tergal and huge collars of shirts, I'll try to make a screenshot). It is making a version for USA.
characters said: "send it to the lab. maybe they can find some DNA... uh... lift some fingerprints.The script focuses on the anguish of the protagonist to understand the situation, return to his world, and the shock that pose to him the differences between the two periods (both procedural and technical).
GD, I'm reading now a John Cheever book and ....., read something well written is a true pleasure!!!!!!!!.............
.
What is the name of the John Cheever book?
QUOTE (butteredparsnips @ Feb 2 2009, 09:03 PM)

I like Gentleman's Agreement, the best of its kind. But it belongs to a genre that pretty much died in the middle fifties, and it was a good death, I think. Movies where we are to learn from some third party's experience instead of directly. We learn about troubled teenagers from James Dean, instead of from Glenn Ford having to Deal with them. That kind of thing. Guess who's coming to dinner might seem a little less dated if it was about the couple instead of the parents' struggle to accept and explanation of why it's okay. A Patch of Blue is much more watchable now, I think.
But I like Gentleman's agreement.
Such a major picture, why do I think of Elia Kazan's career as beginning with Streetcar Named Desire? Maybe because he is so associated with Tennessee Williams?
neu, was that didactic? sorry, lenore.
I saw Gentlemans Agreement as a very young women. It didn't have much meaning to me then. This time I got the message but it seems so out of date now. The confusion in the mind of the girlfriend, fiance I found most sad. Supposedly not predjidice but concerned about what her peers would think. Good scene with her and John Garfield when he explains and clears up her thoughts for her.
I have A patch of Blue recorded on my DVR and there it will stay. Excellant movie for its time. Still had to be done so carefully in some ways. My romantic mind wanted more but it was left open for when she would mature . Shelly Winters brought the ignorance and uneducated woman of her station in life to such realisim. Wonderful job of acting and she received a much deserved Oscar for it.
Sidney Poitier singe handedly did so much for race relations in his movies going back as far as 1947 in A Kiss of Death, which I think was his first major movie. I guess single handedly would be a misstatement as the writers, directors and etc must be considered but the fact that he was so watchable and well liked made such an impact. Just my opinion. I'm a big fanof his.
There seems to be a lot of movies on right now that are featuring race relations. I watched The Last Angry Man with and an older Paul Muni. The best thing about this movie was that race relations were not emphasized. It was just a movie about a caring old doctor that cared for his patients. I don't have the words to describe but if you have not seen it watch for it. It's worthwhile I think. There was a very young Billy Dee Williams in it. So young I had to wait for the credits to confirm it was him.
QUOTE (butteredparsnips @ Feb 3 2009, 06:13 AM)

This is the introduction to The Manuscript found in Saragossa:
As an officer of the French army, I found myself at the siege of Saragossa. A few days after its fall, I was proceeding towards a remote corner of the town when I noticed a small, well-built house which appeared to me not to have been searched as yet by any Frenchmen.
Curiosity prompted me to go in. I knocked on the door but, seeing that it was not closed, I pushed it open. I called out, and searched everywhere, but found nobody. It looked to me as though everything of value had been removed already; the objects left behind on tables and cupboards were of little worth. But in the corner several handwritten books caught my eye; I cast my eyes over the contents of the manuscript. It was in Spanish; I knew very little of the language, but I knew enough to see that the book might well be entertaining. It was all about brigands, ghosts and cabbalists; nothing could be more suitable to divert my mind from the rigours of the campaign than to read a novel full of strange adventures. As I was convinced the book could no longer be restored to its rightful owner, I did not hesitate to possess myself of it.
Later we were forced to abandon Saragossa. I found myself by mischance separated from the main body of the army, and was taken prisoner by the enemy together with my detachment. I thought that was the end of me. Once we had reached the place where they were taking us, the Spanish began to strip us of our possessions. I pleaded to be allowed to keep only one object, which could not be of any use to them: it was the manuscript I had found. They at first raised objections, but in the end consulted their captain who, having cast his eyes over the book, came to me and thanked me for preserving intact a work to which he attached great value, as it contained the history of his ancestors. I told him how it had fallen into my hands. He then took me away with him, and during my quite lengthy stay in his house, where I was treated civilly, I asked him to translate the work for me into French. I wrote what follows as he dictated it.
Which was made into a Polish movie, The Saragossa Manuscript. Long, but with an Intermission. If it sounds like it might get interesting, check it out. Let me know what you think…
I will try to find it.