As for the technical aspects - more thought is required. *ponders* But I'll pitch some stuff your way off the top of my head here...
I think it's one of two things - either the writing isn't as tight as it was in season 1, or the editing isn't going as smoothly as it once did. These two things may be connected - perhaps the editing isn't going as well because the scripts aren't as tight? I don't know if that's the case...although I will say the transitions between stories A and B don't seem as tight and seamless as they were in season 1 (generally speaking). I still think it's a very well-written show, mind you. And this is really strenuous analysis here, which I think is a testament to how great the show was (and still is). Like I said, there are a *lot* of things I really like about this season (especially the character development on Michael and Madeline and Fiona). That's going *very* well, in my opinion. The writers are delving deeper into why Michael is in the precarious position he's in and how this has impacted his life. I think it's going really well on that front.
I guess I tend to think that in regard to the two examples you gave - the difference must be either in the writing or the editing (story editing? or film editing, I guess? Forgive me, I'm woefully inept at knowing technical jargon/cinematic terms). Soooo...
1. the story-line isn't getting fleshed out to the degree it was in season 1 (scripts are being written in broad strokes and there isn't a painstaking attention to detail) - and the choppiness in the scenes would be the result of a film editor/director trying to bridge gaps in the stories themselves;
2. the story-line *is* being written with the same attention to detail, but the editing is very choppy- shortcuts in film editing could be the result of a number of things, I guess - if the scripts aren't as tightly written this year, then scenes wouldn't be as concise and would be in greater need of being edited...maybe. *ahem* I'm really out of my element in knowing technical film stuff, so I don't really know if that's the case.
I think there's another possibility here, and it involves stuntwork. I believe that having JD/GA/BC performing their own stunts made a huge difference in the authenticity/overall polish of the show. There wasn't as big a need to edit things, for instance, because JD had done much of the stunt-work himself. I wonder if there was a clamp-down on the way that stunts could be performed in general, on account of some mishaps that occurred in season 1? Maybe they haven't been able to get the go-ahead for such dramatic stunts as that one in last year's finale? I'm not certain of that, mind you...it's just something I wanted to pitch out there for further thought. Because maybe they can't really film this stuff the way they once did and that leads to what appears to be loopholes in the finished product.
Mostly, though? I think that season finale is going to be reeeeeally hard to top. Honestly - that was two of the best hours of television I've ever seen in my life. And that entire scene (where Michael runs to the parking garage with Philip Cowan/Sam and Fiona witness Melissa and Kent killed by the missile explosion) was flawless. They really set the bar with that scene, I tell ya!
Look forward to reading more of your thoughts on all things BN, Roberto!
[edited for clarity]


