QUOTE (yvette88 @ May 15 2008, 06:38 PM)

Within the context of the script, which appears bad--no. Were it a real situation---yes. Absolutely.
Well, you can't really say with all certainty that the context of the script or the reason for him being there, the scene and whatever, was bad if you haven't seen it. There was a context for it, it was sort of important to the plot, and it did serve a purpose, one that's just kind of hard to explain, even to someone who has seen the movie, here without spoiling it for anyone else who hasn't seen it but wants to.
If you don't want to see it, and don't like to see adult or sex scenes in movies, there's nothing wrong with that. But it wasn't just a sex scene for the sake of sex, there was a purpose for it. The play itself was about three siblings, all raised by the same parents, but with all different expectations and different circumstances and methods that reflected those expectations and circumstances, and it showed how they all turned out, and how the way they were raised affected their relationships with their spouses (the two brothers had been married, the sister hadn't) and with their children, with other people in general. In addition to the sex scenes (which were really kind of tame in their own way, no one got really undressed even), there were also scenes showing these three adult children talking to their various counselors or therapists, to each other, to their mother, and to other people who were outside of their family circle, and in every scene, if you looked for them, you could see hints of who they were, how they became the people they are and how those things affected the connections they formed or were unable to form, the choices they made in their lives... It's about family dynamics and how they shape us and the way that we interact with our families and with the rest of the world, how we approach life. And sex/sexuality is a pretty important, major part of an adult's life.
Plus there are a lot of really funny parts in it as well as some very sad moments, scens that dealt with anger, loss, and all sorts of other strong emotions that we often try to suppress because we feel like they are inappropriate as adults.
And if it helps anything, Ted's character was meeting his wife in the bathroom for sex. Or, technically his ex-wife. One of the defining things about his character was that he found it pretty impossible to let people go and save himself, even if he knew he should, when he wanted to. His character was the most real, the most human and most likable character in the movie and Ted, of course, did a fantastic job. It's kind of a shame that you'll miss out on the wonderful 'Burger King' line if you con't see it, but then, I haven't seen a few of his movies because I can't deal with horror films.
I did rent Silence of the Lambs a couple of years ago, finally, because of Ted, though. I didn't watch most of it, I fast forwarded through every scene that didn't have Ted in it. Hey, maybe you could do that with You Can Thank Me Later. The sex scenes only make up a small portion of the movie, like maybe ten minutes total, which about how much of SotL that I *did* want to see. It really is a good role for Ted.