Geisha are not prostitutes
"If they are not, why do they have to be sold into it and at such a young age?"
I'm sorry that I took that as rhetorical (as in: "Children are sold into the
Geisha life, therefore
Geisha are prostitutes").
I should’ve answered the question as a question. Too late now, but here goes:
"If they are not (prostitutes), why do they have to be sold into it ...?"
I believe that the
Okiya purchases the child so the parents cannot claim a stake in the child's future earnings as a
Geisha. The
Okiya pays for the
Maiko's room and board; all the training in dance, music, ikebana, etc., for all the years it takes for the
Maiko to become a
Geisha. This becomes a sizeable debt.
When the
Maiko (apprentice
Geisha) becomes a full-fledged
Geisha, she repays the
Okiya for all the expenses incurred in her
Geisha training, including the payment to the parents.
"... and at such a young age?"
Like ballet or gymnastics or figure skating, because of the years and years of training and hard work it takes to achieve greatness, it's best to start that training at a young age.
"... sex is part of the job of being a Geisha."
Sex is not a part of the job of being a
Geisha.
Geisha do not provide "sexual services" in exchange for money (or other goods or services of value). I'm surprised that those documentaries about
Geisha would suggest that providing sexual services is part of the job of being a
Geisha.
A
Geisha may choose to have sex with a client, but that is outside of the "
Geisha services" for which the client pays.
In the "Memoirs of a
Geisha" movie: Colonel Derricks asked Sayuri what the protocol was for hiring her (for sex). Sayuri told Col. Derricks that that was not part of the
Geisha's custom. Derricks asked if it was a matter of price. Sayuri said: "If there were a price, you could not pay it."
Sayuri was telling Derricks that one does not pay a
Geisha to have sex with him. Have you ever told someone: "You couldn't pay me enough money to ... [do something]? That's what Sayuri, basically, told Derricks.
"... The Geisha that sleep with their johns, excuse me—dannas—are prostitutes."
Danna are not "johns." A "john" is a prostitute's customer. A
Danna is a Geisha's patron, a sponsor.
Danna don't "hire"
Geisha. Clients and customers hire
Geisha. I'm surprised that those documentaries about
Geisha would suggest that a
Danna is a
Geisha's customer. The
Danna pays off the
Geisha's debt to the
Okiya and financially supports his
Geisha, without a demand, nor even an expectation, for sex. A
Geisha may be a
Danna's "mistress", but that doesn't make a
Geisha a prostitute.
Sex may or may not occur between
Geisha and her
Danna, but the sex is not expected. (OTOH, sex IS expected to occur between between a wife and her husband, isn't it?).
"Why don't women hire Geisha ...?"
Japanese culture. Times are changing, though, unfortunately.
"Why aren't there male Geisha?"
Geisha used to be men only. Then women took over being
Geisha and running the
Okiya.
"... there are different types of geisha..."
As far as I know, there are not different "types" of
Geisha. Either a woman is a
Geisha, or she is not. "
Maiko" are apprentice
Geisha: girls who are still in training to become full-fledged
Geisha.
"
Oiran" are high-priced prostitutes (courtesans), they are not
Geisha. "
Geesha girls" are prostitutes who dress to look like
Geisha. Unlike a
Geisha's kimono, an
Oiran's kimono and a
Geesha girl's kimono is not restrictive to allow for easier removal.
Maiko,
Oiran and
Geesha girls are not
Geisha.
Geisha are
Geisha.
Would it have made any difference if I had taken the question as an interrogatory rather than rhetorical? I doubt it ... since in an attempt to prove that
Geisha are prostitutes, women who marry and have sex with their husbands were proven to be prostitutes, as well.
In the defense of wives out there who are not prostitutes: you are not prostitutes, and neither are
Geisha.