QUOTE (lilah2603)
That is of course right, in a sense. Nevertheless to write a good story doesn't only mean to have a good idea and style and a general idea on how to make it thrilling, but also to know, how to end the story.
The 4400 is not that kind of story. This is the story of what happens to normal people in extraordinary circumstances. This is a story that follows the characters wherever they go and however they develop.
The only way to "end" this story is for the characters to stop changing and growing.The writers had some plot points, and some ideas of where they wanted to take the story, but Ira made it very clear that, if the characters presented a different opportunity (e.g., Billy Campbell leaving the show for a year), they would put the characters first, plot points second. And that is exactly what they did.
QUOTE (lilah2603)
As strange as it might seem to some, the most difficult parts of a story are the beginning and the ending, so that it is not only interesting for the writer, but also for the reader/viewer. It might be that Ira likes wide open endings, but if she makes her stories like that generally, then this is the last show written by her, I've ever watched. I like my endings end-like (I know it's not a word).
Ira is a he, and The 4400 is quite simply
not that kind of story. What you want is Babylon 5, which had a definite beginning, middle and end, all planned well in advance. The 4400 is the opposite. I like them both. You simply have to recognize they are different.
QUOTE (lilah2603)
There is also a huge difference between an open ending and a cliffhanger. By deffinition, there is no wide open end, there is only the show has been cancelled after a cliffhanger or I have this great story, but I don't know how to end it. For Iras sake, I hope it's the first of the two.
It is not a matter of not knowing how to end it. It is a matter of a definite ending being completely inappropriate for this kind of show.
Since there's been no word yet on a series renewal, Behr says that he'll deliver an hour "that could end the series or leave us with great stories for the future." Source:
http://www.tvguide.com/news/4400-burn-notice/070907-01 QUOTE (lilah2603)
BTW, what would interest me is, if Alex is the only person who has read this so called official statement of the writers? Because it seems to me that no one else has. I also wasn't able to find it quoted on any of the German fan-sites, which are usually very rich on information.
I am most certainly not the only person who knows how to read and listen to what the writers have said in
this very forum, and interviews on other sites. The problem here is that certain people are in denial, and they would rather attack me and distort facts than recognize they are wrong.
QUOTE (Elessar)
What I believe is proof that there was a plan for S5 is what Craig Sweeny says just after Ira. Check out the link and make up your own mind about it.

"Plans for season 5" is not the same as having season 5 already planned in detail, on paper. Which would be completely STUPID, knowing how the actors (Billy Campbell, Laura Allen) had significantly changed the path of this show.
The writers wanted to do more than four seasons. No shocking revelation there.
Again, you have to consider the source. Craig Sweeny was a staff writer. Ira was the showrunner and head writer. Do the math. I think they had different ways of thinking about the show. But in the end,
only one of them would get to decide what actually happens on the show. Guess which one.