cenasnumber1fan
Feb 6 2007, 10:50 PM
Who think Snitsky will do good on ECW.If he makes a impact on lashely like that he might be the next number 1 contender for the ECW title.I snitsky will do good in the debut of Snitsky on raw he caused kane to push Lita down to lose her baby.so he is pretty impresive!!!!!!
GAMER263
Feb 7 2007, 09:35 AM
Dont really care about Snitsky But man is he ugly looking !
Slash
Feb 7 2007, 05:55 PM
QUOTE (GAMER263 @ Feb 7 2007, 09:35 AM)

Dont really care about Snitsky But man is he ugly looking !
Don't like the wrestler. WWE is just throwing all the bad talent to ECW (minus Kurt Angle when he wen't, rvd, cm punk.)
cenasnumber1fan
Feb 8 2007, 01:43 PM
Thats one ugly dude.
lilly39
Feb 9 2007, 05:53 PM
Who cares what he looks like he is a great wrestler and its about time they start to use him the right way, and anyway cena is butt ugly and look at that fool.
cenasnumber1fan
Feb 9 2007, 06:19 PM
QUOTE (lilly39 @ Feb 9 2007, 06:53 PM)

Who cares what he looks like he is a great wrestler and its about time they start to use him the right way, and anyway cena is butt ugly and look at that fool.
I think he will do great in ECW.
cenasnumber1fan
Feb 14 2007, 01:47 PM
Snitsky making another impact on ECW last week he kicked Lashely's head off.This week after CM Punk's Match Snitsky came in and kicked CM Punk's head off.When will Snitsky have his own match so he won't interfer with other people's match's.
Slash
Feb 14 2007, 06:01 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Feb 14 2007, 01:47 PM)

Snitsky making another impact on ECW last week he kicked Lashely's head off.This week after CM Punk's Match Snitsky came in and kicked CM Punk's head off.When will Snitsky have his own match so he won't interfer with other people's match's.
Meh. Its just Snitsky. The wwe didn't use him right earlier so i don't really care about him.
cenasnumber1fan
Feb 14 2007, 06:40 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Feb 14 2007, 07:01 PM)

Meh. Its just Snitsky. The wwe didn't use him right earlier so i don't really care about him.
But he is pretty impresive.
Slash
Feb 14 2007, 10:26 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Feb 14 2007, 06:40 PM)

But he is pretty impresive.
I guess.
cenasnumber1fan
Feb 14 2007, 10:44 PM
I think Hardecore Holly might be the next number 1 contender for the ECW title.
Axl
Feb 20 2007, 08:23 PM
Who cares...
It's a sad shame this ECW revival has been wasted. It's basically became the WWE's graveyard... where good wrestler's go to die. Show, Angle, soon Lashley & RVD.
Snitsky, I don't know. I was never impressed with him as a wrestler, but then again he was always an 'instant loss' wrestler. They're wanted to rebuild him into a real force on ECW.
Anyways, ECW's got far bigger problems than Snitsky.
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 27 2007, 10:07 PM
God Snisky SUX.He's think's he is so good.He shoud try do go up against someone that is not a jobber.Like RVD or Lashley.Someone that doesn't suck.
Axl
Mar 28 2007, 03:05 PM
I just fast-forward through the Snitsky stuff at this point.
Is anyone else getting tired of the fact that Balls Mahoney is nothing but a jobber, and Sandman never freakin' wrestlers... ever?!?!?!
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 03:37 PM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 28 2007, 03:05 PM)

I just fast-forward through the Snitsky stuff at this point.
Is anyone else getting tired of the fact that Balls Mahoney is nothing but a jobber, and Sandman never freakin' wrestlers... ever?!?!?!
Balls should wrestle better matchs.Sandman will wrestle at WM.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 03:45 PM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 28 2007, 03:05 PM)

I just fast-forward through the Snitsky stuff at this point.
Is anyone else getting tired of the fact that Balls Mahoney is nothing but a jobber, and Sandman never freakin' wrestlers... ever?!?!?!
The thing is that Sandman doesn't even hit anybody anymore. Plus i havn't seen his entrance for a long time. And yes i'm getting tired of Balls jobbing while the rest of the originals are fighting with the new breed.
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 03:47 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Mar 28 2007, 03:45 PM)

The thing is that Sandman doesn't even hit anybody anymore. Plus i havn't seen his entrance for a long time. And yes i'm getting tired of Balls jobbing while the rest of the originals are fighting with the new breed.
RVD mostly does the work.He's in most of the matchs.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 03:49 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Mar 28 2007, 03:47 PM)

RVD mostly does the work.He's in most of the matchs.
Thats because the wwe is stupid. I love RVD but i want to see sandman hit some people. is the match at wrestlemania a hardcore match?
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 03:50 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Mar 28 2007, 03:49 PM)

Thats because the wwe is stupid. I love RVD but i want to see sandman hit some people. is the match at wrestlemania a hardcore match?
I only like Sandman if he is in a hardcore match.But he sux at wrestling.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 03:52 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Mar 28 2007, 03:50 PM)

I only like Sandman if he is in a hardcore match.But he sux at wrestling.
if you watched some of his indy matches he's not that bad. He was actually better then cena or batista.
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 03:54 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Mar 28 2007, 03:52 PM)

if you watched some of his indy matches he's not that bad. He was actually better then cena or batista.
I can't see him being better than Cena or Batista.Face it he's only good with that cane in his hand.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 04:06 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Mar 28 2007, 03:54 PM)

I can't see him being better than Cena or Batista.Face it he's only good with that cane in his hand.
You see you havn't seen some of his older matches. He is. Your just a person that doesn't want to admit that sandman when he was younger was a much better wrestler then cena or batista.
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 04:19 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Mar 28 2007, 04:06 PM)

You see you havn't seen some of his older matches. He is. Your just a person that doesn't want to admit that sandman when he was younger was a much better wrestler then cena or batista.
I have 2 ECW movies and he's still not that good.He might been a little better because every match back then were hardcore matchs.
Caliban
Mar 28 2007, 05:26 PM
Sandman has never been a very good wrestler. Around 1999 his entrance was the highlight of his act. Fast forward to 2007 and it's the same thing.
Some of his hardcore matches before 1999 were pretty good though, but it was a different style, and time. They don't hold up to something like a Money In The Bank match. The bar keeps getting raised.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 07:02 PM
QUOTE (Caliban @ Mar 28 2007, 05:26 PM)

Sandman has never been a very good wrestler. Around 1999 his entrance was the highlight of his act. Fast forward to 2007 and it's the same thing.
Some of his hardcore matches before 1999 were pretty good though, but it was a different style, and time. They don't hold up to something like a Money In The Bank match. The bar keeps getting raised.
Of course not. Thats the kidn of match that you have guys like JH in. Not the sandman.
cottoncandy707
Mar 28 2007, 10:43 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Feb 8 2007, 01:43 PM)

Thats one ugly dude.
i agree,his music sounds weird too
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 10:46 PM
QUOTE (cottoncandy707 @ Mar 28 2007, 10:43 PM)

i agree,his music sounds weird too

I like his music.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 11:09 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Mar 28 2007, 10:46 PM)

I like his music.

Sandman used to have the best music. But i don't know if he still uses the Metallica version of Enter Sandman.
cenasnumber1fan
Mar 28 2007, 11:16 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Mar 28 2007, 11:09 PM)

Sandman used to have the best music. But i don't know if he still uses the Metallica version of Enter Sandman.
I like Sandman's music to.
Slash
Mar 28 2007, 11:23 PM
QUOTE (cenasnumber1fan @ Mar 28 2007, 11:16 PM)

I like Sandman's music to.
I don't know if they pay the royalties so they probably don't use the Metallica version which is stupid.
Axl
Mar 29 2007, 09:06 PM
Motorhead did a cover of "Enter Sandman", and I believe that's what they use for Sandman.
Slash
Mar 29 2007, 10:18 PM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 29 2007, 09:06 PM)

Motorhead did a cover of "Enter Sandman", and I believe that's what they use for Sandman.
Yeah i don't really dig that. I'm a huge Metallica mark and i usually hate remakes.
Axl
Mar 29 2007, 11:06 PM
Covers can be great if they are done right. "Live and Let Die" anyone?
Motorhead's instrumental sound on "Enter Sandman" is great, but Lemmy's voice just doesn't work. I'm a big Metallica guy & enjoy Motorhead also. I gave Motorhead's version a fair shake, and... it just pales in comparison to Metallica's original.
Slash
Mar 30 2007, 08:40 AM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 29 2007, 11:06 PM)

Covers can be great if they are done right. "Live and Let Die" anyone?
Motorhead's instrumental sound on "Enter Sandman" is great, but Lemmy's voice just doesn't work. I'm a big Metallica guy & enjoy Motorhead also. I gave Motorhead's version a fair shake, and... it just pales in comparison to Metallica's original.
I mean GN'R does it great. Metallica had a great "Turn the Page" cover. Its just lemmy's voice doesn't work for me in a metallica song.
Axl
Mar 30 2007, 03:51 PM
Lemmy's voice only works, period, on Motorhead songs.
I think he should stay away from covers...
Slash
Mar 30 2007, 07:48 PM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 30 2007, 03:51 PM)

Lemmy's voice only works, period, on Motorhead songs.
I think he should stay away from covers...
Well said. Did you like GN'R's Sympathy for the Devil cover? I liked it. But some people really hate it.
Axl
Mar 31 2007, 06:30 PM
I actually liked GNR's "Sympathy For The Devil" cover, even though it kind of represents the breakdown of the original band. I think I still prefer the Stones' original though to it, and that's coming from a Guns fan. The Stones are a hard band to cover, because their originals are such classic, but GN'R tried to cover them constantly. I think Axl & Gilby's cover of "Dead Flowers" was the only case where they surpassed the original.
As for GN'R covers in general, "Sympathy" is good, but I don't know if it's at the top of the list.
Slash
Mar 31 2007, 10:48 PM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 31 2007, 06:30 PM)

I actually liked GNR's "Sympathy For The Devil" cover, even though it kind of represents the breakdown of the original band. I think I still prefer the Stones' original though to it, and that's coming from a Guns fan. The Stones are a hard band to cover, because their originals are such classic, but GN'R tried to cover them constantly. I think Axl & Gilby's cover of "Dead Flowers" was the only case where they surpassed the original.
As for GN'R covers in general, "Sympathy" is good, but I don't know if it's at the top of the list.
Nah i agree. I like Sympathy. The one cover i hated was "hair of the dog".
Axl
Mar 31 2007, 11:49 PM
QUOTE (Slash @ Mar 31 2007, 11:48 PM)

Nah i agree. I like Sympathy. The one cover i hated was "hair of the dog".
I actually thought "Hair of the Dog" was a good Nazareth cover. There's several songs from The Spaghetti Incident I wasn't crazy about, but as far as their in-general played alot covers whether studio or live, the one I disliked was the studio version of "Knockin' On Heaven's Door". It was always much much MUCH better live than in the studio. The studio cut was WAY over-produced.
Slash
Apr 1 2007, 02:26 PM
QUOTE (Axl @ Mar 31 2007, 11:49 PM)

I actually thought "Hair of the Dog" was a good Nazareth cover. There's several songs from The Spaghetti Incident I wasn't crazy about, but as far as their in-general played alot covers whether studio or live, the one I disliked was the studio version of "Knockin' On Heaven's Door". It was always much much MUCH better live than in the studio. The studio cut was WAY over-produced.
I actually don't mind the Knockin on Heaven's door. I love the version from the freddy mercury tribute concert.
QUOTE (Slash @ Apr 1 2007, 03:26 PM)

I actually don't mind the Knockin on Heaven's door. I love the version from the freddy mercury tribute concert.
Me too, and that's exactly what i'm getting at. The sound was freakin' fantastic live. But the studio version was way overproduced. Plus, in the studio cut, what was up with that whole phone call/narration thing in the middle?
I preferred them doing the 'reggae' thing during that segment, live, instead of the narration.
However the live versions are completely different now. When I saw them last year, it's much more mellow, and like a church-hymn, closer to Bob Dylan's original.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.