Westminster REALLY?
#1
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:40 AM
#2
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:51 AM
#3
Posted 15 February 2012 - 11:34 AM
#4
Posted 16 February 2012 - 08:18 AM
Why such a hater? Peaks are great dogs and Malachy had won 114 best in shows. You should become a little more informed about how the judging works before spewing such hate talk. Any of these dogs would have been worthy of top honors. A judge uses his or her judgment to decide which dog most closely meets the criteria of the breeds standard. It's not about which dog is the cutest, it's not a beauty contest. If it it were a mut could win this every year! And a rot would not even be in the running. Geez.
for your info I AM A JUDGE AND I HAVE BEEN A JUDGE FOR 22 YEARS! and i have seen alot of great dogs i even gave the best in show to a peke once. and i believe with my own opinion that, that dog was not the best in show! and who are you to say that a Rottie will never be in the running!
#5
Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:43 PM
for your info I AM A JUDGE AND I HAVE BEEN A JUDGE FOR 22 YEARS! and i have seen alot of great dogs i even gave the best in show to a peke once. and i believe with my own opinion that, that dog was not the best in show! and who are you to say that a Rottie will never be in the running!
If it were about which dog is cute I said. Rots are handsome, Beautiful not cute! In my opinion. Its not about which dog is cute. If you have been a judge than you should know that a part of this is subjective. Any of those dogs could have won. .
Edited by LuvDogs, 16 February 2012 - 01:48 PM.











